I wanted to test this claim with SAT problems. Why SAT? Because solving SAT problems require applying very few rules consistently. The principle stays the same even if you have millions of variables or just a couple. So if you know how to reason properly any SAT instances is solvable given enough time. Also, it's easy to generate completely random SAT problems that make it less likely for LLM to solve the problem based on pure pattern recognition. Therefore, I think it is a good problem type to test whether LLMs can generalize basic rules beyond their training data.
（三）有关选举和决定任命办法、表决办法、通过议案办法，已执行完毕，事实上已经失效的20件；
，详情可参考新收录的资料
Вячеслав Агапов
Merkley has been a long-time leader in the push to end public corruption. He has led the charge to crack down on election gambling and dark money in politics, prevent lawmakers from trading stocks, and ban cryptocurrency-related corruption by elected officials at the highest levels of the federal government.
Изменения в налоговой отчетности с эмоциональным объяснением привлекают ФНС, рассказал бизнес-юрист Макс Лоумен. В беседе с «Лентой.ру» эксперт назвал это и другие приводящие к налоговым проверкам действия.